Code Security Review

Most vulnerabilities in applications are security holes due to insecure coding practices. Most of the time, developers are unaware of the seriousness of the security issues that can arise due to insecure coding. Often, development teams are not formally trained to write secure code, and the resulting code may meet business needs in terms of functionality, but have flaws that could lead to security vulnerabilities being introduced into business applications.
Source code security review exercises (also known as white-box application assessments) are an effective and foolproof mechanism for uncovering design- and code-level security vulnerabilities in business applications. It also helps ensure that critical code-level security controls are properly implemented. While application security testing (gray-box and black-box) can identify security issues, source code review is a foolproof mechanism for identifying vulnerabilities that are difficult or impossible to find in black-box or gray-box application testing.
Typical source code security review activities use a combination of automated code security scans and detailed manual reviews to detect security vulnerabilities in code, identify insecure coding practices, intentional/unintentional Trojans/backdoors and other known application security vulnerabilities (According to Open Web Applications) Security Project (OWASP) Top 10, Web Application Security Alliance (WASC) Standard, and SANS Top 25.
Our team of code security experts conducts fast and effective code reviews to help our clients identify design and code-level security vulnerabilities introduced due to insecure design and coding practices. After the code review is complete, our team provides the client with a comprehensive report detailing any security vulnerabilities discovered during the code security review and recommendations for securing the application code.
Our coverage
SecurEyes provides comprehensive code security review services for multiple platforms and multiple programming languages and frameworks, such as:
Languages: Java, JSP, JavaScript, VBScript, PLSQL, HTML5, C#, VB.NET, ASP.NET, VBScript, ASP, VBScript, VB6, C/C++, PHP, Ruby, ES5, ES6, Typescript, Perl, Android ( Java), Objective C Swift, Python, Groovy, Scala, GO languages
Frameworks: Struts, Spring MVC, Spring Dependency Injection, iBatis, GWT, Hibernate, OWASP ESAPI, JSTL FMT Taglib, ATG DSP Taglib, Java Server Faces (JSF), JSP, Google Guice, PrimeFaces, Telerik, ComponentArt, Infragistics, Hibernate. Net, Entity Framework, ASP.Net MVC Framework, ASP.Net CORE Razor, ASP.NET Core, Zend, Kohana, CakePHP, Symfony, Smarty, bWapp, Ruby on Rails, JQuery, Node.js, Ajax, Knockout, AngularJS, ExpressJS, Pug (Jade), Handlebars, Cordova/PhoneGap, Hapi.JS, XS (SAP), Backbone, Kony Visualizer, ReactJS, SAPUI5, Volley (Android), Django, Akka, Protobuf.


our methodology
The overall method flow of our code security review service is as follows:
Application environment understanding (including coding and deployment details)
Detailed application business understanding and key workflows
Perform automated source code review (or manual code review if language is not covered by automated tools)
Manual validation/analysis to eliminate possible false positives
Discuss and finalize with development team
publish report
our benchmark
Our comprehensive code security review complies with the following well-known global code security assessment guidelines, such as:
OWASP Secure Coding Guidelines
MISRA C, SEI CERT C
MISRA C++, JSF AV C++ Coding Standard, SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard
Safe Coding Guidelines for Java SE (Oracle)
Secure Coding Guidelines for .NET (Microsoft)
25 Most Dangerous SANS Software Errors
and other industry-standard benchmarks for evaluating the security of application code.
Some examples of vulnerabilities found in code reviews are as follows (examples follow):
Injection attacks (SQL injection, code injection, command injection, LDAP injection, Xpath injection)
Insecure session management
Insecure cookie attribute
Insecure transmission of passwords and other sensitive information
Private IP disclosure
Internal Path Disclosure
XML External Entity Attack (XXE)
unsafe deserialization
unsafe direct object reference
race conditions
overflow
Character set conversion problem
logical error
wrong assumption
Cryptographic Key Management Flaws
Sensitive data exposure
Use deprecated/forbidden function calls
resource injection
hardcoded password
password in connection string
Ambient injection
environmental manipulation
Password storage in local database
Root/jailbreak detection
repackaging detection
Hook frame detection
Debugger Protection
Android emulator detection
Device Screen Mirroring Protection
and many others


Why choose us?
Extensive experience in code security review of 3,350,000+ lines of source code for 500+ cross-language/framework applications (including Web Apps, Thick Client, Mobile (Android/iOS), Web Services Applications)
Comprehensive testing that simulates an adversary's actual attack tools, techniques, and processes
Extensive experience in code review across industries including BFSI, Manufacturing, Healthcare, Information Technology, Logistics, Government, Retail, Telecom and more
Trained and experienced code reviewers who provide a customized experience for each client
Comprehensive reporting to help our clients gain insight into code flaws and their corresponding business impact (in business language)
Our customers benefit from our team's close coordination with development teams to help understand defects with the goal of fixing the root cause of the vulnerability using secure coding practices
数据合规创造业务价值
给我们一个开始了解需求的机会,共同来保护贵司的业务。
Copyright © 2025 Shanghai Digital Shell Information Technology Co., Ltd All Rights Reserved.